Skip to content
Arizona Joint Review Ledger
Public profiles · cost context · statewide access

Arizona Joint Review Ledger

What will joint care really cost?

What will every planned visit and treatment cost? A first quote may cover only one part.

Tests, return visits, and travel may cost more. Get the full price in writing before paying a deposit or fee.

What belongs in the written price?

Ask what the first visit includes. Then ask about tests, braces, medicine, and later visits.

The estimate should list every planned visit and treatment. It should also say when the quoted price expires.

If the clinician changes the care, request a new total. Don't agree until you know what was added or removed.

The written price should name the clinician and each treatment. QC Kinetix medical providers, the licensed people giving care, discuss knee or hip surgery alternatives and regenerative treatments prepared from a person's blood.

What does insurance change?

Coverage depends on the treatment and your health plan. The office can help, but your insurance company decides.

Call the number printed on your insurance card. Give them the billing code supplied by the clinic.

Ask whether that clinic is covered by your plan. Also ask whether permission is required and what you would pay.

Get those answers before treatment starts. For a large bill, another doctor's view may help before you commit.

Which travel costs are easy to miss?

Fuel, food, parking, and a hotel can add up. Someone else may also lose time while driving.

Trips from Flagstaff, Yuma, Tucson, Lake Havasu City, or the White Mountains can run long. Weather may add delay.

Ask whether the exam and treatment happen on separate days. Also ask how long you may need to remain nearby.

Add travel costs to the clinic price. Then two written estimates cover the same expenses.

Derek Higgins DO, Pioneer Sports and Spine

Gilbert · google.com

4.9 out of 5 · 449 published reviews · observed 2026-09-03

Open the public source

San Tan Physical Therapy

Queen Creek · google.com

4.9 out of 5 · 180 published reviews · observed 2026-09-03

Open the public source

QC Kinetix - Peoria

Peoria · google.com

4.9 out of 5 · 31 published reviews · observed 2026-09-03

Open the public source

QC Kinetix - Phoenix

Phoenix · google.com

4.8 out of 5 · 18 published reviews · observed 2026-09-03

Open the public source

Advanced Pain Management

Phoenix · google.com

4.7 out of 5 · 543 published reviews · observed 2026-09-03

Open the public source

QC Kinetix - Chandler

Chandler · google.com

4.7 out of 5 · 32 published reviews · observed 2026-09-03

Open the public source

Arizona Pain | Chandler Ocotillo

Chandler · google.com

4.6 out of 5 · 196 published reviews · observed 2026-09-03

Open the public source

QC Kinetix - Scottsdale

Scottsdale · google.com

4.5 out of 5 · 35 published reviews · observed 2026-09-03

Open the public source

Evidence sources

  1. A lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis using the Osteoarthritis Policy Model found total knee replacement in patients with a BMI of 40 or greater increased quality-adjusted life-years by 0.71 and lifetime medical costs by USD 25,200 in those aged 50-65, giving an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of USD 35,200 per QALY; in those older than 65 it added 0.39 QALYs and USD 21,100 in costs. Higher complication risk in this population does not by itself make the operation poor value.

    Chen AT, Bronsther CI, Stanley EE, et al. — The Value of Total Knee Replacement in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis and a Body Mass Index of 40 kg/m(2) or Greater : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2021.

  2. At 10 years, TOPKAT found no clinically meaningful difference between partial and total knee replacement in Oxford Knee Score (mean difference 0.27, 95% CI -1.59 to 2.13). Complications by treatment received were 53/245 (22%) for partial versus 74/270 (27%) for total; reoperations including revision were 9% in both arms; revisions were 15 (6%) versus 11 (4%). Partial replacement was more cost-effective, with lower healthcare costs (mean difference -GBP 731, 95% CI -1352 to -110).

    Beard DJ, Davies LJ, Cook JA, et al. — Assessing clinical and cost effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement (TOPKAT): 10-year follow-up of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.. The Lancet Rheumatology, 2026.

What can the clinic discuss with you?

QC Kinetix charges nothing for the first consultation, where medical providers, the licensed people giving care, discuss regenerative treatments prepared from a person's blood.

book a free consultation